This site is written by me, but not entirely without help.

The articles here — project retrospectives, technical write-ups — are drafted with AI assistance (currently Claude): I give it the source material (code, old CVs, notes, conversation), it researches, structures, and drafts the prose, and I review, correct, and edit before anything gets published. That’s a different relationship than spell-check or grammar cleanup on something I wrote first — the wording itself is usually AI-drafted, not human-typed-then-polished.

What I do hold the line on: the underlying facts. Code samples, technical claims, and project history are checked against real sources — repositories, READMEs, git history, my own memory when nothing else survives — not invented to fill a gap. When something can’t be verified, the article says so directly, rather than smoothing it into false confidence. If you read a line like “this is a reconstruction from memory, unverified,” that hedge is deliberate, not filler.

I’m writing this page because I’d rather say it plainly than have a reader sense something’s off about the prose and wonder if they’re being misled.